[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMgYe=8usEDMemLfwu-amfiEJAWCqKu4GjV4oLwK8u8K0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 14:39:35 -0700
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 #2
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
> I don't agree with everything above, but it's not worth arguing for the
> sake of arguing. :) I think we can tweak what you're doing now and get
> things to work well by merging new dts files with at91-<soc>-board.dts
> as the name. As mentioned, don't worry about the existing files. This
> shouldn't be a significiant change to what you've been telling people
> since 3.10 to cause much confusion.
A the end of the day, as long as you have at91- as prefix we'll be OK I think.
If you can consistently add the SoC into the prefix as above, we'll be
even better. But I'm not going to spend more time arguing it. :)
Either way, consistency (going forward) with at91- is good.
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists