[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140521141231.5752baae@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 14:12:31 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.c between commit fa81511bb0bb ("x86-64,
modify_ldt: Make support for 16-bit segments a runtime option") from
Linus' tree and commit 18d0a6fd2271 ("x86, vdso: Move the 32-bit vdso
special pages after the text") from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.c
index e1f220e3ca68,c3ed708e50f4..000000000000
--- a/arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.c
@@@ -36,12 -21,6 +21,10 @@@
#define VDSO_DEFAULT 1
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
- #define vdso_enabled sysctl_vsyscall32
- #define arch_setup_additional_pages syscall32_setup_pages
+extern int sysctl_ldt16;
+#endif
+
/*
* Should the kernel map a VDSO page into processes and pass its
* address down to glibc upon exec()?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists