[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5258228.rMTDJps2Fm@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 01:48:43 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
Ips Gandhi <inderpal.s@...sung.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Chander Kashyap <k.chander@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] PM/OPP: discard duplicate OPPs
On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 09:33:42 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21 May 2014 02:39, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> >> + /* Duplicate OPPs ? */
> >> + if (new_opp->rate == opp->rate) {
> >> + int ret = (new_opp->u_volt == opp->u_volt) && opp->available ?
> >> + 0 : -EEXIST;
> >
> > The parens are not necessary. And is the direction correct?
>
> What do you mean by direction here ?
The case in which we want to return 0. Never mind, it's OK. The parens are still
not necessary, though.
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists