[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140522154035.76113672@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 15:40:35 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-intel-fixes
tree
Hi Dave,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c between commit f93e94efebbe ("drm/i915:
Fix dynamic allocation of physical handles") from the drm-intel-fixes
tree and commit c8725f3dc091 ("drm/i915: Do not call retire_requests
from wait_for_rendering") from the drm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 3326770c9ed2,e1fa919017e2..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@@ -43,7 -43,14 +43,9 @@@ static void i915_gem_object_flush_cpu_w
static __must_check int
i915_gem_object_wait_rendering(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
bool readonly);
+ static void
+ i915_gem_object_retire(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
-static int i915_gem_phys_pwrite(struct drm_device *dev,
- struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
- struct drm_i915_gem_pwrite *args,
- struct drm_file *file);
-
static void i915_gem_write_fence(struct drm_device *dev, int reg,
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj);
static void i915_gem_object_update_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists