[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140522085135.GC1651@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:51:35 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, matthew.garrett@...ula.com,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 09/11] ACPI: introduce flag .is_master_device
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:43:07PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On δΈ‰, 2014-05-21 at 11:52 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:44:14PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > For some ACPI device objects, they represent master devices,
> > > and their children devices are enumerated by bus controller drivers
> > > for the buses they are on.
> > >
> > > In this case, we do not want to enumerate their children devices to
> > > platform bus explicitly in acpi scan code.
> > >
> > > Thus a new flag .is_master_device is introduced in this patch.
> > >
> > > For devices with this flag set, we will not do default enumeration
> > > for their children.
> >
> > Is there any particular reason we would like to enumerate everything
> > below the first device by default?
>
> we do not enumerate everything below the first device by default, we
> just enumerate all the devices with _HID.
OK.
> But if a device has _HID and it is enumerated by its parents to a
> separate bus, we need this flag set for its parent.
How about checking if the device has *SerialBus() connector and in such
case skip the device (given that it is not listed in a special list,
like acpi_platform_device_ids)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists