[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537DE20E.9050706@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 15:39:58 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: George Cherian <george.cherian@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
CC: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, balbi@...com, zonque@...il.com,
b-liu@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] usb: musb: dsps: Add the sw_babble_control()
On 22-05-2014 10:29, George Cherian wrote:
> Add sw_babble_control() logic to differentiate between transient
> babble and real babble condition. Also add the SW babble control
> register definitions.
> Babble control register logic is implemented in the latest
> revision of AM335x.
> Signed-off-by: George Cherian <george.cherian@...com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/usb/musb/musb_regs.h | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c
> index f6f3087..868caf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_dsps.c
> @@ -536,6 +536,56 @@ static int dsps_musb_set_mode(struct musb *musb, u8 mode)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int sw_babble_control(struct musb *musb)
> +{
Doesn't gcc complain on this function being unused? I think you should
have added this function along with the caller, not separately.
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists