lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 22 May 2014 05:28:23 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Corey Minyard <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
	peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, cminyard@...sta.com
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Initialize rq->
 age_stamp on processor start

Commit-ID:  a803f0261bb2bb57aab5542af3174db43b2a3887
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/a803f0261bb2bb57aab5542af3174db43b2a3887
Author:     Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 8 May 2014 13:47:39 -0500
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:16:35 +0200

sched: Initialize rq->age_stamp on processor start

If the sched_clock time starts at a large value, the kernel will spin
in sched_avg_update for a long time while rq->age_stamp catches up
with rq->clock.

The comment in kernel/sched/clock.c says that there is no strict promise
that it starts at zero.  So initialize rq->age_stamp when a cpu starts up
to avoid this.

I was seeing long delays on a simulator that didn't start the clock at
zero.  This might also be an issue on reboots on processors that don't
re-initialize the timer to zero on reset, and when using kexec.

Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1399574859-11714-1-git-send-email-minyard@acm.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index f5605b6..da302ca 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5089,10 +5089,20 @@ static struct notifier_block migration_notifier = {
 	.priority = CPU_PRI_MIGRATION,
 };
 
+static void __cpuinit set_cpu_rq_start_time(void)
+{
+	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+	rq->age_stamp = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
+}
+
 static int sched_cpu_active(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 				      unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 {
 	switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
+	case CPU_STARTING:
+		set_cpu_rq_start_time();
+		return NOTIFY_OK;
 	case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
 		set_cpu_active((long)hcpu, true);
 		return NOTIFY_OK;
@@ -6970,6 +6980,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 	if (cpu_isolated_map == NULL)
 		zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_isolated_map, GFP_NOWAIT);
 	idle_thread_set_boot_cpu();
+	set_cpu_rq_start_time();
 #endif
 	init_sched_fair_class();
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists