linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s5pv210: remove unused call of pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK9yfHz2kdfkf+o7fKMRu=nMXxbcHJ227bjpvA=WXt6ptH3QRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 May 2014 08:52:20 +0530
From:	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s5pv210: remove unused call of pr_err()

On 22 May 2014 01:23, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
> A call of pr_err() was added in v3.1. It was guarded by a check for
> CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE. The Kconfig symbol PM_VERBOSE was removed in v3.0. So
> this call of pr_err() has never been used. Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
> ---
> Untested.
>
>  drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> index ab2c1a40d437..0873729135df 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c
> @@ -175,10 +175,6 @@ static int s5pv210_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
>         mutex_lock(&set_freq_lock);
>
>         if (no_cpufreq_access) {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE
> -               pr_err("%s:%d denied access to %s as it is disabled"
> -                               "temporarily\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
> -#endif

The config symbol itself is not defined and hence could be removed.
However I feel, the
error message could be retained after trimming down the arguments a bit.

-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/