[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537E1EE6.8080102@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:59:34 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux-FSDevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fs/superblock: Avoid locking counting inodes and
dentries before reclaiming them
On 05/22/2014 05:09 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
>
> We remove the call to grab_super_passive in call to super_cache_count.
> This becomes a scalability bottleneck as multiple threads are trying to do
> memory reclamation, e.g. when we are doing large amount of file read and
> page cache is under pressure. The cached objects quickly got reclaimed
> down to 0 and we are aborting the cache_scan() reclaim. But counting
> creates a log jam acquiring the sb_lock.
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists