linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: use kmem_cache instead of aligned stack allocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 May 2014 15:43:47 -0700
From:	Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, peterz@...radead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, michael@...erman.id.au,
	mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org, imunsie@....ibm.com,
	acme@...stprotocols.net, scottwood@...escale.com,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: use kmem_cache instead of aligned
 stack allocations

On 05/22/2014 03:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Cody,
>
> On Thu, 22 May 2014 15:29:08 -0700 Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> -	*res = be64_to_cpu(result_buffer.result);
>> +	*res = be64_to_cpu(result_buffer->result);
>> +	kfree(result_buffer);
>> +	kfree(request_buffer);
>> +	return ret;
>
> Why not just fall through here by removing the above 3 lines?

No reason except me not noticing it.

>> +
>> +out_hcall:
>> +	kfree(result_buffer);
>> +out_resb:
>> +	kfree(request_buffer);
>> +out_reqb:
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/