[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140523094929.15f4613c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 09:49:29 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, michael@...erman.id.au,
mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org, imunsie@....ibm.com,
acme@...stprotocols.net, scottwood@...escale.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: use kmem_cache instead of
aligned stack allocations
Hi Cody,
On Thu, 22 May 2014 15:44:25 -0700 Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> if (ret) {
> if (success_expected)
> pr_err_ratelimited("hcall failed: %d %#x %#x %d => 0x%lx (%ld) detail=0x%x failing ix=%x\n",
> domain, offset, ix, lpar,
> ret, ret,
> - result_buffer.buf.detailed_rc,
> - result_buffer.buf.failing_request_ix);
> - return ret;
> + result_buffer->buf.detailed_rc,
> + result_buffer->buf.failing_request_ix);
> + goto out_hcall;
> }
>
> - *res = be64_to_cpu(result_buffer.result);
> + *res = be64_to_cpu(result_buffer->result);
not a biggie, but this last bit could be (remove the goto out_hcall and
teh label and then)
} else {
*res = be64_to_cpu(result_buffer->result);
}
> +out_hcall:
> + kfree(result_buffer);
> +out_resb:
> + kfree(request_buffer);
> +out_reqb:
> return ret;
> }
>
otherwise looks good to me.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists