linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pwm tree with the leds tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140523071940.GC6310@ulmo>
Date:	Fri, 23 May 2014 09:19:41 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pwm tree with the leds tree

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:24:23PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the pwm tree got a conflict in
> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c between commit 5f7b03dc2ab5 ("leds: leds-pwm:
> provide a common function to setup a single led-pwm device") from the
> leds tree and commit 81225bed3273 ("leds: leds-pwm: retrieve configured
> PWM period") from the pwm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> (no action is required).

The resolution below looks good to me. Thanks!

Alexandre, Bryan, as far as I can tell there are no dependencies between
this patch and the rest of the series that Alexandre sent, so perhaps it
would be a better idea to take this particular patch via Bryan's leds
tree?

Then again the resolution looks like something that Linus can reasonably
handle, so maybe things are fine as-is.

Thierry

> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
> 
> diff --cc drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> index f5cf1b0f2748,aa770ec1e892..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c
> @@@ -96,75 -92,55 +96,75 @@@ static void led_pwm_cleanup(struct led_
>   	}
>   }
>   
>  -static int led_pwm_create_of(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  -			     struct led_pwm_priv *priv)
>  +static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv,
>  +		       struct led_pwm *led, struct device_node *child)
>   {
>  -	struct device_node *child;
>  +	struct led_pwm_data *led_data = &priv->leds[priv->num_leds];
>   	int ret;
>   
>  -	for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) {
>  -		struct led_pwm_data *led_dat = &priv->leds[priv->num_leds];
>  +	led_data->active_low = led->active_low;
> - 	led_data->period = led->pwm_period_ns;
>  +	led_data->cdev.name = led->name;
>  +	led_data->cdev.default_trigger = led->default_trigger;
>  +	led_data->cdev.brightness_set = led_pwm_set;
>  +	led_data->cdev.brightness = LED_OFF;
>  +	led_data->cdev.max_brightness = led->max_brightness;
>  +	led_data->cdev.flags = LED_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME;
>   
>  -		led_dat->cdev.name = of_get_property(child, "label",
>  -						     NULL) ? : child->name;
>  +	if (child)
>  +		led_data->pwm = devm_of_pwm_get(dev, child, NULL);
>  +	else
>  +		led_data->pwm = devm_pwm_get(dev, led->name);
>  +	if (IS_ERR(led_data->pwm)) {
>  +		ret = PTR_ERR(led_data->pwm);
>  +		dev_err(dev, "unable to request PWM for %s: %d\n",
>  +			led->name, ret);
>  +		return ret;
>  +	}
>   
> - 	if (child)
> - 		led_data->period = pwm_get_period(led_data->pwm);
>  -		led_dat->pwm = devm_of_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, child, NULL);
>  -		if (IS_ERR(led_dat->pwm)) {
>  -			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM for %s\n",
>  -				led_dat->cdev.name);
>  -			ret = PTR_ERR(led_dat->pwm);
>  -			goto err;
>  -		}
>  -		/* Get the period from PWM core when n*/
>  -		led_dat->period = pwm_get_period(led_dat->pwm);
> ++	led_data->period = pwm_get_period(led_data->pwm);
> ++	if (!led_data->period && (led->pwm_period_ns > 0))
> ++		led_data->period = led->pwm_period_ns;
>   
>  -		led_dat->cdev.default_trigger = of_get_property(child,
>  -						"linux,default-trigger", NULL);
>  -		of_property_read_u32(child, "max-brightness",
>  -				     &led_dat->cdev.max_brightness);
>  +	led_data->can_sleep = pwm_can_sleep(led_data->pwm);
>  +	if (led_data->can_sleep)
>  +		INIT_WORK(&led_data->work, led_pwm_work);
>  +
>  +	ret = led_classdev_register(dev, &led_data->cdev);
>  +	if (ret == 0) {
>  +		priv->num_leds++;
>  +	} else {
>  +		dev_err(dev, "failed to register PWM led for %s: %d\n",
>  +			led->name, ret);
>  +	}
>  +
>  +	return ret;
>  +}
>  +
>  +static int led_pwm_create_of(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv)
>  +{
>  +	struct device_node *child;
>  +	struct led_pwm led;
>  +	int ret = 0;
>  +
>  +	memset(&led, 0, sizeof(led));
>   
>  -		led_dat->cdev.brightness_set = led_pwm_set;
>  -		led_dat->cdev.brightness = LED_OFF;
>  -		led_dat->cdev.flags |= LED_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME;
>  +	for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, child) {
>  +		led.name = of_get_property(child, "label", NULL) ? :
>  +			   child->name;
>   
>  -		led_dat->can_sleep = pwm_can_sleep(led_dat->pwm);
>  -		if (led_dat->can_sleep)
>  -			INIT_WORK(&led_dat->work, led_pwm_work);
>  +		led.default_trigger = of_get_property(child,
>  +						"linux,default-trigger", NULL);
>  +		led.active_low = of_property_read_bool(child, "active-low");
>  +		of_property_read_u32(child, "max-brightness",
>  +				     &led.max_brightness);
>   
>  -		ret = led_classdev_register(&pdev->dev, &led_dat->cdev);
>  -		if (ret < 0) {
>  -			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register for %s\n",
>  -				led_dat->cdev.name);
>  +		ret = led_pwm_add(dev, priv, &led, child);
>  +		if (ret) {
>   			of_node_put(child);
>  -			goto err;
>  +			break;
>   		}
>  -		priv->num_leds++;
>   	}
>   
>  -	return 0;
>  -err:
>  -	led_pwm_cleanup(priv);
>  -
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   



Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped