lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 23 May 2014 10:33:19 +0200
From:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	wim@...ana.be, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, dbaryshkov@...il.com,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] wdt: sunxi: Move restart code to the watchdog
 driver

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 02:12:07PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:34:44PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 05:04:22PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:11:23AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 02:33:18PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:44:19PM -0500, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > > > Most of the watchdog code is duplicated between the machine restart code and
> > > > > > the watchdog driver. Add the restart hook to the watchdog driver, to be able to
> > > > > > remove it from the machine code eventually.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> > > > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > > > 
> > > > Wim, do you have any comment on this one?
> > > 
> > > Ping?
> > > 
> > > It would be really great to see this in 3.16, and we get quite close
> > > to the end of ARM's merge window.
> > 
> > Ping?
> > 
> > Guenter, since you seem to be the only responsive, may I suggest that
> > you start merging patches and do a pull request to either Wim or Linus
> > directly during the merge window?
> > 
> I had prepared a pull request for Wim last weekend or so, but then there
> were more patches piling in and I got distracted, so I didn't have time
> to actually send it. I'll try again this weekend ... the kids should be
> busy learning for their finals, and I'll have Friday and Monday off
> from work, so I should be able to find the time.
> 
> As for sending patches to Linus directly, well, Wim is the watchdog maintainer.
> I manage to upset enough people, and would not want to add Wim to the list.
> 
> The patches _are_ in my watchdog-next branch and get some coverage from
> both my auto-builders and from Fenguang's build robots, so while they are
> not in linux-next, they are not completely in the dark either.

Ok, so I can merge the other patches then.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists