lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 23 May 2014 11:43:42 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	hch@...radead.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, apw@...onical.com,
	nbd@...nwrt.org, neilb@...e.de, jordipujolp@...il.com,
	ezk@....cs.sunysb.edu, dhowells@...hat.com, sedat.dilek@...il.com,
	hooanon05@...oo.co.jp, mszeredi@...e.cz
Subject: [PATCH 12/13] fs: limit filesystem stacking depth

From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>

Add a simple read-only counter to super_block that indicates how deep this
is in the stack of filesystems.  Previously ecryptfs was the only stackable
filesystem and it explicitly disallowed multiple layers of itself.

Overlayfs, however, can be stacked recursively and also may be stacked
on top of ecryptfs or vice versa.

To limit the kernel stack usage we must limit the depth of the
filesystem stack.  Initially the limit is set to 2.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
---
 fs/ecryptfs/main.c   |  7 +++++++
 fs/overlayfs/super.c | 10 ++++++++++
 include/linux/fs.h   | 11 +++++++++++
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
index 1b119d3bf924..c4cd1fd86cc2 100644
--- a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
@@ -566,6 +566,13 @@ static struct dentry *ecryptfs_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type, int flags
 	s->s_maxbytes = path.dentry->d_sb->s_maxbytes;
 	s->s_blocksize = path.dentry->d_sb->s_blocksize;
 	s->s_magic = ECRYPTFS_SUPER_MAGIC;
+	s->s_stack_depth = path.dentry->d_sb->s_stack_depth + 1;
+
+	rc = -EINVAL;
+	if (s->s_stack_depth > FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) {
+		pr_err("eCryptfs: maximum fs stacking depth exceeded\n");
+		goto out_free;
+	}
 
 	inode = ecryptfs_get_inode(path.dentry->d_inode, s);
 	rc = PTR_ERR(inode);
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
index fcbd92a14e69..04879abbbf98 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
@@ -644,6 +644,16 @@ static int ovl_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
 	}
 	ufs->lower_namelen = statfs.f_namelen;
 
+	sb->s_stack_depth = max(upperpath.mnt->mnt_sb->s_stack_depth,
+				lowerpath.mnt->mnt_sb->s_stack_depth) + 1;
+
+	err = -EINVAL;
+	if (sb->s_stack_depth > FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) {
+		pr_err("overlayfs: maximum fs stacking depth exceeded\n");
+		goto out_put_lowerpath;
+	}
+
+
 	ufs->upper_mnt = clone_private_mount(&upperpath);
 	err = PTR_ERR(ufs->upper_mnt);
 	if (IS_ERR(ufs->upper_mnt)) {
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 48d3bd908b5d..340c5e3be0d0 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -266,6 +266,12 @@ struct iattr {
  */
 #include <linux/quota.h>
 
+/*
+ * Maximum number of layers of fs stack.  Needs to be limited to
+ * prevent kernel stack overflow
+ */
+#define FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH 2
+
 /** 
  * enum positive_aop_returns - aop return codes with specific semantics
  *
@@ -1269,6 +1275,11 @@ struct super_block {
 	struct list_lru		s_dentry_lru ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 	struct list_lru		s_inode_lru ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 	struct rcu_head		rcu;
+
+	/*
+	 * Indicates how deep in a filesystem stack this SB is
+	 */
+	int s_stack_depth;
 };
 
 extern struct timespec current_fs_time(struct super_block *sb);
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ