[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1400838717.22900.15.camel@jtkirshe-mobl>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 02:51:57 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Manuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@....de>
Cc: jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, bruce.w.allan@...el.com,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000: Use time_after() for time comparison
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 22:21 +0200, Manuel Schölling wrote:
> To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are
> modified
> to use time_after() instead of plain, error-prone math.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@....de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks Manuel, I have added your patch to my queue.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists