[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537F49C2.3000304@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 22:14:42 +0900
From: Akira Hayakawa <ruby.wktk@...il.com>
To: dm-devel@...hat.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, masami.hiramatsu@...il.com,
devel@...ukata.com
Subject: Re: dm-writeboost: Progress Report
Hi Guys,
This progress report includes very important benchmarking results, which shows
i) Write will always improve - It boosts writes (396% in the best case) even with really small cache (say, 64MB) because of the sophisticated writeback optimization.
ii) Read won't be bad - It doesn't so much deteriorate the read (less than 1% for SSD+HDD case) because of the insignificant overhead.
iii) Good in application workloads - 22% improvement with read-intensive workload and 234-299% improvement with fileserver workload (using dbench)
Yeah, merging Writeboost into the mainline is my goal now and I really need your feedbacks.
For more details, please read the previous post.
Cheers,
- Akira
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists