[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140523143810.GE21319@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 15:38:10 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"monstr@...str.eu" <monstr@...str.eu>,
"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"broonie@...aro.org" <broonie@...aro.org>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/18] sparc: io: implement dummy relaxed accessor
macros for writes
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:18:38PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 05:47:26PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > write{b,w,l,q}_relaxed are implemented by some architectures in order to
> > permit memory-mapped I/O accesses with weaker barrier semantics than the
> > non-relaxed variants.
> >
> > This patch adds dummy macros for the write accessors to sparc, in the
> > same vein as the dummy definitions for the relaxed read accessors. The
> > existing relaxed read{b,w,l} accessors are moved into asm/io.h, since
> > they are identical between 32-bit and 64-bit machines.
> >
> > Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Look good:
> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Thanks, Sam.
> But you should wait for David's ack too.
Yeah, I still need to get buy-in on the semantics from the PPC folks
anyway.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists