[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537F6C85.107@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 08:43:01 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"monstr@...str.eu" <monstr@...str.eu>,
"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"broonie@...aro.org" <broonie@...aro.org>,
"benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/18] x86: io: implement dummy relaxed accessor macros
for writes
On 05/23/2014 08:34 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>
> There is also a documentation patch [1] in this series but, again, I didn't
> CC everybody on it. Sorry, but the level of interest this sort of stuff
> generates amongst kernel developers is close to zero so I only included
> people I thought cared on CC for the entire series. I'm stuck between a rock
> and a hard place trying to CC interested people whilst at the same time
> trying to avoid spamming all the arch maintainers.
>
If you are sending me a patch, please include me on the cover letter for
the patch series. You don't have to send me the entire patch series
(although for something like a Documentation patch which affects x86 I
would consider including the union list as well.)
I think regardless of level of interest, the definition of
cross-architectural operations is exactly the arch maintainers job, so
it isn't really out of place to "spam" us...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists