| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140523162055.GE30599@e104805>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 17:20:55 +0100
From: "Javi Merino" <javi.merino@....com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Punit Agrawal <Punit.Agrawal@....com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: document struct thermal_zone_device and
thermal_governor
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:44:51PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> Hello Javi,
Hi Eduardo,
Sorry for the wrong From: in my previous email, I hope that this one
goes out with the correct one.
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:35:52AM +0100, Javi Merino wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 04:27:30PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:16:08PM +0100, Javi Merino wrote:
> > >
> > > > Document struct struct thermal_zone_device and struct thermal_governor
> > > > fields and their use by the thermal framework code.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> > > > Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Hi linux-pm,
> > > >
> > > > I have some patches that add new fields to these structures but I
> > > > don't have a good place to describe those fields as these structs are
> > > > mostly undocumented so I thought I'd document them.
> > > >
> > > > I'm unsure about some of the descriptions, specially for passive and
> > > > forced_passive so please review them.
> > > >
> > > > include/linux/thermal.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
> > > > index f7e11c7ea7d9..af928c667dba 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
> > > > @@ -158,6 +158,40 @@ struct thermal_attr {
> > > > char name[THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH];
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * struct thermal_zone_device - structure for a thermal zone
> > > > + * @id: unique id number for each thermal zone
> > > > + * @type: the thermal zone device type
> > > > + * @device: struct device for this thermal zone
> > > > + * @trip_temp_attrs: attributes for trip points for sysfs: trip temperature
> > > > + * @trip_type_attrs: attributes for trip points for sysfs: trip type
> > > > + * @trip_hyst_attrs: attributes for trip points for sysfs: trip hysteresis
> > > > + * @devdata: private pointer for device private data
> > > > + * @trips: number of trip points the thermal zone supports
> > > > + * @passive_delay: number of milliseconds to wait between polls when
> > > > + * performing passive cooling. Only used by the step-wise
> > >
> > > I don't think this parameter is specific to step-wise.
> >
> > It's only used by step-wise, all the other governors always poll at
> > polling_delay.
>
> Agreed, but the fact we have only one governor using it, it does not
> imply it is a specific concept for that governor. The concept can and
> should be reused by other governors. Idea is simple, you have different
> temporal / thermal evolution when idle, when monitoring passive cooling actions. And this fact won't change, no matter the policy you apply.
If this is so generic, shouldn't it be done by the thermal core code
instead of left to the governors? Something like:
if (temperature > temp_of_first_passive_trip_point)
tz->passive = 1;
> > While we are at it, can we change the name so that it's more generic and
> > can be reused by other governors? Something like idle_poll and
> > active_poll? I'm open to suggestions for a better name.
> >
>
> active_poll means when cooling devices are active? which kind of cooling
> devices?
Ok, I guess it's just confusing in my head. I'll change the power
allocator governor to set tz->passive to true when we want to poll at
a faster rate.
> > > > + * governor
> > > > + * @polling_delay: number of milliseconds to wait between polls when
> > > > + * checking whether trip points have been crossed (0 for
> > > > + * interrupt driven systems)
> > > > + * @temperature: current temperature. This is only for core code,
> > > > + * drivers should use thermal_zone_get_temp() to get the
> > > > + * current temperature
> > > > + * @last_temperature: previous temperature read
> > > > + * @emul_temperature: emulated temperature when using CONFIG_THERMAL_EMULATION
> > > > + * @passive: step-wise specific parameter. 1 if you've crossed a passive
> > > > + * trip point, 0 otherwise
> > >
> > > ditto.
> >
> > ditto, no other governor changes passive and it can't be changed from
> > sysfs.
> >
> > > > + * @forced_passive: step-wise specific parameter. If > 0, temperature at
> > > > + * which to switch on all cpufreq cooling devices.
> > >
> > > ditto.
> >
> > Again, this is step-wise specific. You can change it from sysfs, but
> > the other governors (userspace and fair-share) will happily ignore
> > you.
> >
> > > Also, governors are not aware of specific cooling devices.
> >
> > I didn't say that governors are aware of specific cooling devices. I
> > said that if forced_passive is greater than 0, then only cpufreq
> > cooling devices are switched on. It's wrong, it's not cpufreq cooling
> > devices, it's ACPI Processor cooling devices.
> >
>
> I mean, we don't have only cpufreq cooling devices.
True, but forced_passive only acts on ACPI Processor cooling devices,
that's why I was trying to document it. In
drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c:passive_store():
list_for_each_entry(cdev, &thermal_cdev_list, node) {
if (!strncmp("Processor", cdev->type,
sizeof("Processor")))
thermal_zone_bind_cooling_device(tz,
THERMAL_TRIPS_NONE, cdev,
THERMAL_NO_LIMIT,
THERMAL_NO_LIMIT);
}
By the way, shouldn't that sizeof() be strlen()?
Cheers,
Javi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists