[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMioT1QSaBY6vs30E5ez5OouzaHhZE8dTEK1Rf0NekCZjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 15:01:47 -0700
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 at91-dt3 #3
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> On 23/05/2014 at 23:27:51 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
>> On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> > Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more
>> > SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request
>> > but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration
>> > option).
>>
>> Four done, four more to go? Nice progress!
>>
>
> I'm on it ;) I actually have two more almost ready but I will submit the
> remaining four for 3.17. I don't think this is urgent enough to rush it
> and I'd like to test it enough before we start removing the old clock
> implementation and board files.
I think we should spend some more time discussing DTS naming instead!
(Just kidding, good progress. Agreed, let it go in when it's ready,
it's why we do frequent kernel releases)
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists