linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 1/8] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: remove dependency on thermal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 24 May 2014 14:59:47 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
	Ips Gandhi <inderpal.s@...sung.com>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
	Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/8] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: remove dependency on
 thermal

On Fri 2014-05-23 10:03:27, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22 May 2014 20:22, Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com> wrote:
> > However, on CPUs that needs thermal managment, it makes sense to have
> > such dependency, from functional perspective. Mainly because scaling
> > frequency and voltage up would be allowed only when thermal management
> > is enabled.
> 
> AFAIK, dependencies in KCONFIG are only for fixing compilation time issues.

I do not think that's correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/