linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: introduce function imx_free_mx3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140524152200.GA4666@lianli>
Date:	Sat, 24 May 2014 17:22:00 +0200
From:	Emil Goode <emilgoode@...il.com>
To:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: introduce function imx_free_mx3_camera

Hello Uwe and Greg,

> You'd do a better deed if you picked up
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1613364/focus=1635995

Since there is nothing wrong with the last version of the patch in
the above thread, I feel strange about picking it up and just splitting
it into two patches. However it would be good to have it applied.

I think the reason why the author didn't resend is that the object file
and data structure layout information in the changelog depend on the
changes to both .name and .dma_mask and by splitting the patch this
information would not apply to any one of the resulting two patches.

Perhaps keeping this information in the changelog is a good reason for
applying the patch as it is?

(I have attached the patch in question)

Best regards,

Emil Goode

View attachment "0001-driver-core-platform-don-t-leak-memory-allocated-for.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (9959 bytes)