lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+qeAOqUQ07YpFJjvFstUCDzt6-P_zBz-O1==OOYeBVOJ8Gppw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 25 May 2014 22:17:21 +0800
From:	Dongsheng Yang <dongsheng081251@...il.com>
To:	Manuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@....de>
Cc:	infinipath@...el.com, roland@...nel.org, sean.hefty@...el.com,
	hal.rosenstock@...il.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipath: use time_before()/_after()

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Manuel Schölling
<manuel.schoelling@....de> wrote:
> To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are
> modified to use time_before/_after() instead of plain, error-prone math.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@....de>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_intr.c |    4 ++--
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_sdma.c |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_intr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_intr.c
> index 26dfbc8..01ba792 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_intr.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_intr.c
> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ void ipath_disarm_senderrbufs(struct ipath_devdata *dd)
>         if (sbuf[0] || sbuf[1] || (piobcnt > 128 && (sbuf[2] || sbuf[3]))) {
>                 int i;
>                 if (ipath_debug & (__IPATH_PKTDBG|__IPATH_DBG) &&
> -                       dd->ipath_lastcancel > jiffies) {
> +                       time_after(dd->ipath_lastcancel, jiffies)) {

Why not time_is_after_jiffies()?

>                         __IPATH_DBG_WHICH(__IPATH_PKTDBG|__IPATH_DBG,
>                                           "SendbufErrs %lx %lx", sbuf[0],
>                                           sbuf[1]);
> @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ static int handle_errors(struct ipath_devdata *dd, ipath_err_t errs)
>
>         /* likely due to cancel; so suppress message unless verbose */
>         if ((errs & (INFINIPATH_E_SPKTLEN | INFINIPATH_E_SPIOARMLAUNCH)) &&
> -               dd->ipath_lastcancel > jiffies) {
> +               time_after(dd->ipath_lastcancel, jiffies)) {
>                 /* armlaunch takes precedence; it often causes both. */
>                 ipath_cdbg(VERBOSE,
>                         "Suppressed %s error (%llx) after sendbuf cancel\n",
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_sdma.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_sdma.c
> index 98ac18e..17a5177 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_sdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_sdma.c
> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static void sdma_abort_task(unsigned long opaque)
>
>         /* ipath_sdma_abort() is done, waiting for interrupt */
>         if (status == IPATH_SDMA_ABORT_DISARMED) {
> -               if (jiffies < dd->ipath_sdma_abort_intr_timeout)
> +               if (time_before(jiffies, dd->ipath_sdma_abort_intr_timeout))
>                         goto resched_noprint;
>                 /* give up, intr got lost somewhere */
>                 ipath_dbg("give up waiting for SDMADISABLED intr\n");
> @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ resched:
>          * JAG - this is bad to just have default be a loop without
>          * state change
>          */
> -       if (jiffies > dd->ipath_sdma_abort_jiffies) {
> +       if (time_after(jiffies, dd->ipath_sdma_abort_jiffies)) {
>                 ipath_dbg("looping with status 0x%08lx\n",
>                           dd->ipath_sdma_status);
>                 dd->ipath_sdma_abort_jiffies = jiffies + 5 * HZ;
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ