linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Staging: Silicom: bpctl_mod.c & bypass.c: Fixed a lot of checkpatch.pl warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 25 May 2014 11:03:57 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Chaitanya Hazarey <c@...io>
Cc:	chad@...c.us, michael.banken@...he.stud.uni-erlangen.de,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: Silicom: bpctl_mod.c & bypass.c: Fixed a lot of
 checkpatch.pl warnings

On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 10:25:28PM -0700, Chaitanya Hazarey wrote:
> Added a blank line after declarations in many places to fix the
> following warning issued by checkpatch.pl:
> 
> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
> 
> Thanks Greg K-H and Dan for the patience. Hope it works this time, I did
> apply it against staging and it was ok. 


Hm, something is odd, it still doesn't apply properly:

$ p1 < ../s1
checking file drivers/staging/silicom/bpctl_mod.c
Hunk #40 FAILED at 4773.
Hunk #41 FAILED at 4821.
...
Hunk #89 FAILED at 7534.
3 out of 89 hunks FAILED

Can you refresh this against my tree again and resend?  I think we are
out of sync here still.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/