[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAih0Nige+Cjoh6c=718P2R4BV5=RczuGh17voVgZEc_hyz16Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 08:52:23 -0500
From: Jeff Smith <jsmith.lkml@...il.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kenny Simpson <theonetruekenny@...il.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: remap_file_pages() use
I've got no real issues at this point, but could you perhaps elaborate
a bit on the rough order of magnitude of "long" time and what cases
would be slower? I'm pretty sure that some places I've worked that
still have some remap_file_pages() logic in place aren't too religious
about checking dmesg.
--Jeff
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Jeff Smith wrote:
>> OK, I misinterpreted "the overlapped part of the mapping(s) will be
>> discarded" as discarding the -new- mappings. My objections about
>> needing a replacement for remap_file_pages() are gone, but my concerns
>> about existing code still remain.
>
> As I said, emulation will be there for long time. With warning in dmesg.
> The emulation is interface-compatible, but slower in some cases (not
> your's).
>
> --
> Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists