linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] wan: time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140526.004045.1779020170437806699.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 26 May 2014 00:40:45 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	joe@...ches.com
Cc:	manuel.schoelling@....de, kevin.curtis@...site.co.uk,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wan: time_before()

From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 10:58:52 -0700

> On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 19:32 +0200, Manuel Schölling wrote:
>> To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are
>> modified to use time_before() instead of plain, error-prone math.
> 
> Sensible change, but it seems these should be
> udelay(some_constant) instead of a a rather
> variable time wait based on a system/config
> defined jiffies.

Agreed, this code probably wants udelay(10) or something like
that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/