[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALkh-HgGuGaR3rimNeCgRUexU1LgKMbSZ+WcPMmzD6UwtVC7pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 08:18:59 +0300
From: Пламен Петров
<plamen.sisi@...il.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] do_mounts: try all available filesystems before panicking
2014-05-26 7:19 GMT+03:00 Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>:
> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 11:19:04AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 10:08:13AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 01:04:09PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> > > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Plamen Petrov <plamen.sisi@...il.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > The story short: on systems with btrfs root I have a kernel .config with ext4,
>> > > > xfs and btrfs built-in which works fine with 3.13.x, but 3.14.x panics. After
>> > > > inserting some debug printks, I got this info from mount_block_root:
>> > > >
>> > > > ---> EACCESS=13, EINVAL=22, Available filesystems: ext3 ext2 ext4 fuseblk xfs btrfs
>> > > > -----> Tried ext3, error code is -22.
>> > > > -----> Tried ext2, error code is -22.
>> > > > -----> Tried ext4, error code is -22.
>> > > > -----> Tried fuseblk, error code is -22.
>> > > > -----> Tried xfs, error code is -38.
>> > > > VFS: Cannot open root device "sda2" or unknown-block(8,2): error -38
>> > > > Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available partitions:
>>
>> BTW, This is the original thread with lots of triage in it:
>>
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg33455.html
>>
>> But that doesn't reach any conclusion. I suspect that the
>> change of btrfs init (from very early (@~1.8s into the boot) until a
>> few milliseconds before the root mount is changing the order in
>> which the filesystem type list is traversed by the mount, resulting
>> in XFS being used to probe the device before btrfs.
>
> On that point, on 3.15-rc6:
>
> $ tail -1 /proc/filesystems
> btrfs
> $
>
>> Why XFS is seeing /dev/sda2 as containing an XFS filesystem is not
>> yet clear, but perhaps once you've dumped the the first sector of
>> the btrfs partition all will become clear....
>
> No need, I found the regression. Plamen, can you please try the
> patch below?
>
Yes, Dave. I applied your patch on top of linux 3.15-rc5. I tried the patch
you sent in a VM I used for tests.
With only your patch applied - the system boots up normally.
Thanks for the different perspectives, guys! Always a pleasure
communicating with you. After a month or so waiting - definetly worth it!
Thanks a lot!
--
Plamen Petrov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists