lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 11:59:09 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com> Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>, "cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()' On 23 May 2014 21:44, Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com> wrote: > Viresh: Could you imagine something similar for cpufreq? You suggested > migrating to Hz resolution. I guess that would ideally mean to follow > the CCF to a 64-bit type for frequencies and increasing the resolution. > I have a messy patch migrating cpufreq and OPP to Hz and unsigned long > that works on Zynq. But cpufreq has so many users that it would become > quite an undertaking. > And we'd need some new/amended OPP DT binding. If we are going to migrate to Hz from KHz, I think we must consider the 64 bit stuff right now, otherwise it will bite us later. @Rafael: What do you think? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists