[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140527075436.GE12920@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 09:54:36 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] perf tests: Add test for caching dso file
descriptors
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:36:44AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2014 19:23:34 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > Adding test that setup test_dso_data__fd_limit and test
> > dso data file descriptors are cached appropriately.
>
> [SNIP]
> > +static long open_files_cnt(void)
> > +{
> > + char path[PATH_MAX];
> > + struct dirent *dent;
> > + DIR *dir;
> > + long nr = 0;
> > + int n;
> > +
> > + n = scnprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/self/fd", procfs__mountpoint());
> > + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("couldn't get fd path", n < PATH_MAX);
>
> Looks like an unnecessary check since the scnprintf() cannot return more
> than (or equal to) PATH_MAX.
once it's equal it's bad.. as the man says:
"return value of size or more means that the output was truncated"
I'll fix the rest you found
thanks,
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists