[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1401178947.15450.2.camel@x220>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 10:22:27 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] befs: remove check for CONFIG_BEFS_RW
Befs contains a check for CONFIG_BEFS_RW for over a decade now. The
related Kconfig symbol never existed, so this check always evaluated to
true. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
---
Compile tested. Does this still qualify as trivial?
fs/befs/linuxvfs.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c b/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
index d626756ff721..46149526b580 100644
--- a/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
+++ b/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c
@@ -808,13 +808,11 @@ befs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
befs_debug(sb, "---> %s", __func__);
-#ifndef CONFIG_BEFS_RW
if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
befs_warning(sb,
"No write support. Marking filesystem read-only");
sb->s_flags |= MS_RDONLY;
}
-#endif /* CONFIG_BEFS_RW */
/*
* Set dummy blocksize to read super block.
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists