[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140527115859.GA30458@dhcp-27-189.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 13:58:59 +0200
From: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
m.lombardi85@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] bio: modify __bio_add_page() to accept pages that
don't start a new segment
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 06:15:45PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>
> If the page can be merged to last segment, it should have been
> covered by code in branch of 'if (bio->bi_vcnt > 0) ...', shouldn't it?
>
> Or maybe it is better to make that code cover your case since
> looks your case is similar with that one according to your commit
> log.
>
I realized that maybe you mean this branch:
if (bio->bi_vcnt > 1 && (BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE(bvec-1, bvec)))
right?
In this case the branch is not even reached in the original code because
the function returned an error way before executing it (line 760)
There was already a patchset trying to modify the code in a different way than mine:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/linux.kernel/3IanUpBVhFQ/3Xbg3yLRFp4J
but it has been ignored and in my opinion it takes a more
complicated approach.
Regards,
Maurizio Lombardi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists