[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140527134156.GA14099@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 15:41:56 +0200
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@...il.com>,
ingo.tuchscherer@...ibm.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans-Georg Markgraf <MGRF@...ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 00/03]: hwrng: an in-kernel rngd
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 09:53:53AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de> wrote:
> > You're right. Would anyone object to call it "quality", as in RX signal quality?
> > In context of a random source that is pretty accurate, I'd say. Other opinions?
>
> I'm okay with "quality", although I'm still partial to "entropy_per_1000bits".
So, since there were no other comments, here's v5 with aforementioned change.
Default is still "off". Patch 02/03 de-fuzzed for 3.15.
Torsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists