[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140527142726.GB30458@dhcp-27-189.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 16:27:26 +0200
From: Maurizio Lombardi <mlombard@...hat.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maurizio Lombardi <m.lombardi85@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] bio: modify __bio_add_page() to accept pages that
don't start a new segment
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:04:58PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>
> Looks your approach is simpler.
>
> But looks there is one problem if I understand correctly:
> __blk_recalc_rq_segments() may not cover the last vector
> because bio->bi_iter.bi_size isn't updated until the end of
> __bio_add_page().
>
> But it shouldn't have been related with current virtio-blk problem.
>
This is a valid point, bi_iter.bi_size influences the behaviour of
blk_recount_segments(). Maybe Jens can confirm your observation.
Anyway it doesn't explain the reason behind the regression
introduced by commit 3979ef4dcf
Maurizio Lombardi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists