linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] sched: expel confusing usage of the term "power"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1405271036040.17310@knanqh.ubzr>
Date:	Tue, 27 May 2014 10:46:01 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] sched: expel confusing usage of the term
 "power"

On Tue, 27 May 2014, Vincent Guittot wrote:

> Hi Nicolas,
> 
> There are still some use of "power" instead of "capacity" in the sched
> directory like SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER, ARCH_POWER or NONTASK_POWER. They
> should also be renamed in capacity as there are also used for capacity

I thought the first one was used to identify CPU sharing the same 
(electric) power domain.  Or maybe I confused it with 
SD_SHARE_POWERDOMAIN, illustrating the point once again for this series.

I'll create additional patches.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/