[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohponagSjOVbn-C64yh7=py9kE0m2VGbdquo_1+UzbPFsJ+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 05:34:01 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@....com>,
Ips Gandhi <inderpal.s@...sung.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/8] driver/core: cpu: initialize opp table
On 27 May 2014 05:02, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> Do you actually use cpu anywere in this function for anything other than
> just accessing cpu->dev? If not, why not to pass cpu->dev to it and
> move it somewhere in the OPP core?
We are also using it for cpu->dev_id, but that's not so important. This
routine wouldn't have existed if you wouldn't have asked for it. It is
just a wrapper over of_init_opp_table, which also has a dummy
implementation when its not supported.
So, it might not be worth enough for any other code to use it. :)
And so I added it here.
Let me know how/where do you want it and I will resend it quickly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists