linux-kernel - Re: [vfs] 662aa027bda: -7.2% will-it-scale.scalability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1401207939.5731.12.camel@tucsk.piliscsaba.szeredi.hu>
Date:	Tue, 27 May 2014 18:25:39 +0200
From:	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
To:	Jet Chen <jet.chen@...el.com>
Cc:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org
Subject: Re: [vfs] 662aa027bda: -7.2% will-it-scale.scalability

On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 23:58 +0800, Jet Chen wrote:
> Hi Miklos,
> 
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git overlayfs.v22
> commit 662aa027bdaa082aa3dd21886830c97a1dd4c184 ("vfs: add RENAME_WHITEOUT")
> 
> test case: lkp-wsx01/will-it-scale/lseek2

The only thing I see in that commit that could affect performance is the
slightly larger icache footprint of ext4_rename().

Is the regression reproducible across different -rc versions?

Thanks,
Miklos

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/