linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] VM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140527172930.GE11074@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Tue, 27 May 2014 19:29:30 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>
Cc:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
	Mike Marciniszyn <infinipath@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] VM_PINNED

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:56:44AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > > Code could be easily added to alloc_pages_vma() to consider the pinned
> > > status on allocation. Remove GFP_MOVABLE if the vma is pinned.
> >
> > Yes, but alloc_pages_vma() isn't used for shared pages (with exception
> > of shmem and hugetlbfs).
> 
> alloc_pages_vma() is used for all paths where we populate address ranges
> with pages. This is what we are doing when pinning. Pages are not
> allocated outside of a vma context.
> 
> What do you mean by shared pages that are not shmem pages? AnonPages that
> are referenced from multiple processes?

Regular files.. they get allocated through __page_cache_alloc(). AFAIK
there is nothing stopping people from pinning file pages for RDMA or
other purposes. Unusual maybe, but certainly not impossible, and
therefore we must be able to handle it.

> > So whichever way around we have to do the mm_populate() + eviction hook
> > + migration code, and since that equally covers the anon case, why
> > bother?
> 
> Migration is expensive and the memory registration overhead already
> causes lots of complaints.

Sure, but first to the simple thing, then if its a problem do something
else.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/