[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53840368.4030004@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 08:45:52 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: viresh.kumar@...aro.org, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: governor: Be friendly towards latency-sensitive
bursty workloads
On 05/27/2014 04:57 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi Srivatsa,
>
> On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 02:23:38 AM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> Cpufreq governors like the ondemand governor calculate the load on the CPU
>> periodically by employing deferrable timers. A deferrable timer won't fire
>> if the CPU is completely idle (and there are no other timers to be run), in
>> order to avoid unnecessary wakeups and thus save CPU power.
>>
>> However, the load calculation logic is agnostic to all this, and this can
>> lead to the problem described below.
>
> This is subtle enough that I need some more time to chew on it, but since the
> merge window is coming, I'm not sure when that's going to happen honestly.
>
Sure, I completely understand. Please take your time, no hurry!
Thank you very much!
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists