linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: flush queued bios when the process blocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALJ65znW7YK2moi6w6n-cm725c7Czci44EFzHDNv4y=sNcF66g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 May 2014 10:59:19 -0700
From:	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	"Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@...hat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: flush queued bios when the process blocks

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> This really begs the question of why we just don't use the per-process plugs
> for this. We already have scheduler hooks in place to flush those at the
> appropriate time. Why are we reinventing something for essentially the same
> thing?

Yes! Unifying the two plugging mechanisms has been on my todo/wishlist for ages.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/