[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140527222404.GE4366@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 00:24:04 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, MCE: Flesh out when to panic comment
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:53:56PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> It is far from obvious that mce_severity() will always say that an
> error detected inside the kernel will be fatal.
Oh yeah, it needs a good cleansing rewrite, that's for sure.
And this tolerant check looks fishy to me:
if (s->sev >= MCE_UC_SEVERITY && ctx == IN_KERNEL) {
if (panic_on_oops || tolerant < 1)
return MCE_PANIC_SEVERITY;
}
since we set it to 1 by default. But I'll look again on a clear head
tomorrow - it is too late here.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists