linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <233568355.QJI3TVGr1I@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Wed, 28 May 2014 01:12:57 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arvind.chauhan@....com,
	edubezval@...il.com, pavel@....cz, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulators: Add definition of regulator_set_voltage_time() for !CONFIG_REGULATOR

On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 08:29:23 PM Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> --wJgPvdDu+gj56kJ8
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> 
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 05:37:29PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 
> > Liam/Broonie: Please see if this can go through Rafael as 2nd patch is dependent
> > on it.
> 
> Is that likely to happen before the merge window?

Depending.  If there's -rc8, then maybe.  Otherwise, nope.

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/