[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5385ABDD.6000205@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 11:26:53 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Alan Tull <atull@...era.com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpio: dwapb: use a second irq chip
On 05/28/2014 11:01 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
> <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
>> What remains in my queue is:
>>
>> * gpio: dwapb: use irq_linear_revmap() for the faster lookup
>> * gpio: dwapb: use irq_gc_lock() for locking instead bc's lock
>> * gpio: dwapb: use d->mask instead of BIT(bit)
>>
>> what do we do about those?
>
> Rebase on my devel branch and resend please ... but for linear
> revmap I'd much prefer some effort being put into using the
> gpiolib irqchip helpers with generic chips instead.
Hmmm. I would have to look what this is about. The irq_linear_revmap()
lookup is a linear lookup.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists