linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140528133832.GA2541@deathray>
Date:	Wed, 28 May 2014 08:38:32 -0500
From:	Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Stickel <ms@...able.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with Linus' tree

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 07:00:11PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the gpio tree got a conflict in
> drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c between commit 99e4b98dbe3a ("gpio:
> mcp23s08: Bug fix of SPI device tree registration") from Linus' tree
> and commit 3e3bed913e8b ("gpio: mcp23s08: fixed count variable for
> devicetree probing") from the gpio tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (one way - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> (no action is required).
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
> 
> diff --cc drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
> index 3d53fd6880d1,00fbb30b9b10..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mcp23s08.c
> @@@ -894,11 -894,14 +894,12 @@@ static int mcp23s08_probe(struct spi_de
>   			dev_err(&spi->dev, "invalid spi-present-mask\n");
>   			return -ENODEV;
>   		}
> + 
>   		for (addr = 0; addr < ARRAY_SIZE(pdata->chip); addr++) {
> - 			if ((spi_present_mask & (1 << addr)))
> - 				chips++;
>   			pullups[addr] = 0;
> + 			if (spi_present_mask & (1 << addr))
> + 				chips++;
>   		}
>  -		if (!chips)
>  -			return -ENODEV;
>   	} else {
>   		type = spi_get_device_id(spi)->driver_data;
>   		pdata = dev_get_platdata(&spi->dev);


Looking at the Linux next version, I am fairly certian that the following is
redundant checking:
                if (chips < 0) {
                        dev_err(&spi->dev, "FATAL: invalid negative chip id\n");
                        goto fail;
                }

The chips variable should equal the number of bits in the spi_present_mask variable.
Or am I missing something?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/