[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140528144643.GG29957@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 07:46:43 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] perf, x86: use the PEBS auto reload mechanism
when possible
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 09:59:37AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 02:18:08PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> > When a fixed period is specified, this patch make perf use the PEBS
> > auto reload mechanism. This makes normal profiling faster, because
> > it avoids one costly MSR write in the PMI handler.
> >
>
> You can't do this unconditionally. Like I think you mention in the next
> patch, we need the PMI to fix up lots of cases.
There are two cases:
(1) Fixed period specified with PEBS.
The PMI still runs with threshold=1, but we can use the PEBS
auto-reload mechanism to automatically rewrite the counter which is
faster.
(2) Free running mode with more constraints
This is case (1)
-andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists