linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] misc: atmel_pwm: only build for supported platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140528155916.GA9793@piout.net>
Date:	Wed, 28 May 2014 17:59:16 +0200
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: atmel_pwm: only build for supported platforms

Hi,

On 28/05/2014 at 14:24:27 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote :
> > >  config ATMEL_PWM
> > >  	tristate "Atmel AT32/AT91 PWM support"
> > > -	depends on HAVE_CLK && (AVR32 || ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST)
> > > +	depends on HAVE_CLK
> > > +	depends on AVR32 || AT91SAM9263 || AT91SAM9RL || AT91SAM9G45
> 
> Symbols AT91SAM9263, AT91SAM9RL, and AT91SAM9G45 do not seem to exist in
> next-20140528. Should these perhaps be SOC_AT91SAM9263, SOC_AT91SAM9RL,
> and SOC_AT91SAM9G45 and/or ARCH_AT91SAM9263, ARCH_AT91SAM9RL, and
> ARCH_AT91SAM9G45?
> 

I wouldn't bother too much fixing that, this will definitely be remove
in 3.17. I was too late for 3.16 because my series was waiting on
another patch set.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/