linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5386090F.9060004@cs.wisc.edu>
Date:	Wed, 28 May 2014 11:04:31 -0500
From:	Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Vikas Chaudhary <vikas.chaudhary@...gic.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] scsi patch queue tree

On 05/28/2014 10:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:37:31AM -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
>> On 05/28/2014 05:54 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>       be2iscsi: Fix processing cqe for cxn whose endpoint is freed
>>
>> I didn't look at your tree, but when this patch was posted on the list I
>> think it had a bug.
>>
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg74191.html
> 
> I read through it and saw your comment, but so far it seems the patch
> and especially the series does more good than harm.

Did you see these patchsets:

[PATCH 00/10] qla4xxx: 5.04.00-k5: Updates for scsi "misc" branch
and
[PATCH 0/6] qla4xxx: 5.04.00-k6: Updates for scsi "misc" branch

? I think they should be ok for your tree if you did not see any issues
with them.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/