linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] misc: atmel_pwm: only build for supported platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140528184217.GB30031@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 May 2014 11:42:17 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: atmel_pwm: only build for supported platforms

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 07:59:08PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 19:55 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 28/05/2014 at 18:09:43 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote :
> > > On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 17:59 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > > > On 28/05/2014 at 14:24:27 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote :
> > > > > > >  config ATMEL_PWM
> > > > > > >  	tristate "Atmel AT32/AT91 PWM support"
> > > > > > > -	depends on HAVE_CLK && (AVR32 || ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST)
> > > > > > > +	depends on HAVE_CLK
> > > > > > > +	depends on AVR32 || AT91SAM9263 || AT91SAM9RL || AT91SAM9G45
> > > > > 
> > > > > Symbols AT91SAM9263, AT91SAM9RL, and AT91SAM9G45 do not seem to exist in
> > > > > next-20140528. Should these perhaps be SOC_AT91SAM9263, SOC_AT91SAM9RL,
> > > > > and SOC_AT91SAM9G45 and/or ARCH_AT91SAM9263, ARCH_AT91SAM9RL, and
> > > > > ARCH_AT91SAM9G45?
> > > > 
> > > > I wouldn't bother too much fixing that, this will definitely be remove
> > > > in 3.17. 
> > > 
> > > Are you talking about: 1) the problem this patch tried to fix; or 2) the
> > > problem it created?
> > > 
> > 
> > I'm removing the whole atmel_pwm driver so the CONFIG_ATMEL_PWM symbol
> > will be gone.
> 
> So the patch we're discussing here will never be included in a release?

So, should I just remove it right now?  I like deleting files :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/