linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] sc_phy:SmartCard(SC) PHY interface to SC controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140528184408.GC30031@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 May 2014 11:44:08 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Satish Patel <satish.patel@...com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	rob@...dley.net, tony@...mide.com, grant.likely@...aro.org,
	robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] sc_phy:SmartCard(SC) PHY interface to SC
 controller

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 02:27:13PM +0530, Satish Patel wrote:
> +/**
> + * struct sc_phy - The basic smart card phy structure
> + *
> + * @dev: phy device
> + * @pdata: pointer to phy's private data structure
> + * @set_config: called to set phy's configuration
> + * @get_config: called to get phy's configuration
> + * @activate_card: perform smart card activation
> + * @deactivate_card: perform smart card de-activation
> + * @warm_reset: execute smart card warm reset sequence
> + * @register_card_activity_cb: register call back to phy device.
> + * This call back will be called on card insert or remove event
> + *
> + * smart card controller uses this interface to communicate with
> + * smart card via phy.Some smart card phy has multiple slots for
> + * cards. This inerface also enables controller to communicate with
> + * one or more smart card connected over phy.
> + */
> +struct sc_phy {
> +	/* phy's device pointer */
> +	struct device *dev;

So this is the "parent", right?  Why not embed a struct device into this
structure as well, further streaching out the device tree.

> +
> +	/* phy's private data */
> +	void *pdata;

If you do the above, then this pointer is not needed.


> +
> +	/* notify data, passed by interface user as a part of
> +	 * register_notify API. Data should be passed back when
> +	 * notification raised to the interface user
> +	 */
> +	void *notify_data;

What makes this different from the pdata?


> +
> +	int	(*set_config)(struct sc_phy *phy, u8 slot,
> +			enum sc_phy_config attr, int value);
> +	int	(*get_config)(struct sc_phy *phy, u8 slot, enum
> +			sc_phy_config attr);
> +	int	(*activate_card)(struct sc_phy *phy, u8 slot);
> +	int	(*deactivate_card)(struct sc_phy *phy, u8 slot);
> +	int	(*get_syncatr)(struct sc_phy *phy, u8 slot, u8 len, char *atr);
> +	int	(*warm_reset)(struct sc_phy *phy, u8 slot);
> +	int	(*register_notify)(struct sc_phy *phy,
> +			 struct	notifier_block *nb, void *notify_data);
> +	int	(*unregister_notify)(struct sc_phy *phy,
> +			struct	notifier_block *nb);
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* __SC_PHY_H__ */
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/