[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140528201125.GZ10771@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 15:11:25 -0500
From: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
"Fleming, Matt" <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] export efi.flags to sysfs
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 03:04:00PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:51:04AM -0500, Alex Thorlton wrote:
>
> [..]
> > A side note, though: We're going to have to figure out some way to
> > determine whether or not to apply the old_map quirk on during boot
> > anyway, so if it's easiest for you to just determine how the original
> > kernel was booted and key off of that, then I wouldn't worry about
> > finding a different method to get the firmware version in userspace,
> > unless there are other reasons for you to do it that way.
>
> Agreed. Let kernel and firmware figure it out when to apply quirk and
> user space should not worry about firmware version.
>
> I liked the other approach better where user space just needs to know
> if 1:1 mapping are in effect or not and take decision based on that.
>
> So once SGI firmware gets fixed for 1:1 mapping, and kernel knows it,
> then user space will not have to be changed at all.
Sounds good to me. Working on a potential kernel fix as we speak.
- Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists