[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1405290000350.17241@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 00:02:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Dave Anderson <anderson@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] printk: safe printing in NMI context
On Fri, 9 May 2014, Petr Mladek wrote:
> printk() cannot be used safely in NMI context because it uses internal locks
> and thus could cause a deadlock. Unfortunately there are circumstances when
> calling printk from NMI is very useful. For example, all WARN.*(in_nmi())
> would be much more helpful if they didn't lockup the machine.
>
> Another example would be arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace for x86 which uses NMI
> to dump traces on all CPU (either triggered by sysrq+l or from RCU stall
> detector).
I am rather surprised that this patchset hasn't received a single review
comment for 3 weeks.
Let me point out that the issues Petr is talking about in the cover letter
are real -- we've actually seen the lockups triggered by RCU stall
detector trying to dump stacks on all CPUs, and hard-locking machine up
while doing so.
So this really needs to be solved.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists